Effects of discriminatory practice in Health and social care Essay Example

Effects of discriminatory practice in Health and social care Essay The above instance survey is foregrounding favoritism. This is the unequal intervention between persons and it is a negative action towards members of a certain group. The bases of favoritism include: civilization. disablement. age. societal category. gender. sexual orientation. wellness position. household position and cognitive ability. The prejudiced practise used in the instance of Jeta is predjudice. This is judging person and doing an premise without holding any solid grounds to back up the opinion. on the footing of their visual aspect or what group they belong to. Jeta is sing this as her instructor is doing a false premise about her thought that she is lazy and blue as her criterion of public presentation in school assesments is diminishing. There are many lending factors that can take to the predjudice that Jeta is sing. One of these factors is societal background. Jeta comes from a rough background. lives entirely with her female parent who is a individual parent and her male parent is in prison. Another factor taking to predjudice could be socialisation. This is when the media create humbling stereotypes about specific groups of people. The media assumes that if person is in prison. they are associated with bad behavior and are automatically given a negative feeling on. As Jeta is related to person in prison. the instructor is presuming that she’s every bit as bad and discriminates against her. The instructor is about blaming the male parent state of affairs on the hapless school work produced by Jeta. We will write a custom essay sample on Effects of discriminatory practice in Health and social care specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Effects of discriminatory practice in Health and social care specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Effects of discriminatory practice in Health and social care specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Another prejudiced practise that Jeta is sing is pigeonholing. Stereotyping is a widely held but fixed oversimplified image or thought of a certain type of individual. Pigeonholing can hold a demetrial consequence on the person involved. They involve generalisations about the most common features of members of the group. There are many factors which could propose why Jeta is being stereotyped. The first is societal classification. This is sorting people into groups based on common properties that persons portion. In relation to Jeta she is being stereotyped as lazy because the criterion of her school assesments are dropping. She is besides being stereotyped as naughty and this could be due to the societal facet that her male parents in prision significance she is being percieved as this blue kid. Another base for favoritism is age. Age favoritism occurs when person is treated below the belt due to their age without any given justification or logical thinking. The fact that the kid concerned in this survey is of rather a immature age of 9 old ages old means she is more vunerable to age favoritism and this normally occurs because the kid is seen to hold less societal power. Jeta is sing age favoritism because she is seen to hold less of an authoritive figure compared to her instructor. Children in todays society are more likely to confront favoritism due to their addiction on grownups and the determinations that are made for them. Children experience favoritism on other evidences including race. gender. societal category. wellness position. disablities and many more. Jeta is being stereotyped as this lazy character and due to her age. the instructor isn’t listening to her despite being told legion times by Jeta that she can non see the board from the dorsum of the schoolroom. Jeta’s age could be an index as to why she is being stereotyped as she is undistinguished compared to the instructor and has little or no power so her sentiments and positions are merely ignored. Another prejudiced practise that Jeta is confronting is inequality. This is where people are non treated the same because some persons have more power. authorization. money etc. Jeta is sing this as she is non being granted the same chances to instruction and rights to larn as everyone else in her category. Due to this inequality she could be left in a vunerable place as she could be at a hazard of falling behind in category and making even worse in appraisals than earlier. The chief base for favoritism is this instance survey is Jeta’s diability. She has haples s sight and this explains her low criterion of work in lessons. She is being discriminated for holding this disablement and this could ensue in her feeling vunerable and cause low ego regard. She is being segregated from the remainder of the category being sent to the dorsum of the schoolroom and this could strike hard her assurance. This is besides doing the state of affairs worse as Jeta will non be able to concentrate on the undertakings set in category as she can non see what is is being taught. Alternatively of supplying Jeta with the right extra acquisition support she requires. the instructor has placed her right at the dorsum of the category. segregated from her other schoolmates. The Disability Discrimination Act ( DDA ) makes it improper to know apart against person who has a disablement. This act is covered by most sectors including the instruction sector which means it should be covered in all schools and administrations. The DDA screens eyesight jobs so Jeta’s demands should be met. Initially. Jeta’s instructor is being improper as she isn’t seting to the DDA criterions to accommodate Jeta’s demands. If no alterations are made. Jet a’s seeing could deteriate and decline. Jeta presently has no spectacless or any signifier of equipment to assist imporve her seeing so being at the dorsum is non assisting the state of affairs in respect to Jeta.

The Role of FDI of Economic Growth of The Host Economy The WritePass Journal

The Role of FDI of Economic Growth of The Host Economy The Role of FDI of Economic Growth of The Host Economy } De Mello, L.R., 1999. FDI-led growth: evidence from time series and panel data, Oxford Economic Papers, 51: 133-151. De Mello, L.R. and K. Fukasaku, 2000. â€Å"Trade and FDI in Latin America and Southeast Asia: temporal causality analysis†, Journal of International Development, 7: 903-924. Djankov, S. and B. Hoekman, 1999. â€Å"Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises†, World Bank Economic Review, 14: 49-64. Eden, L., 1998. Taxing multinationals: transfer pricing and corporate income taxation in North America. University of Toronto press. Fortanier, F., 2007. â€Å"Foreign direct investment and host country economic growth: does the investors country of origin play a role?† Transnational corporations, Vol. 16 (2). Available from unctad.org/en/docs/iteiit20072a2_en.pdf { Accessed 2nd January 2012} Gopinath, M., and W. Chen, 2003. â€Å"Foreign Direct Investment and Wages: a Cross-CountryAnalysis†, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 12(3):285-309. Ikiara, M.M., 2003. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Technology Transfer, and Poverty Alleviation: Africa’s Hopes and Dilemma. African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) Special Paper Series No. 16. IMF, 1993. Balance of Payments Manual, Fifth Edition, Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund Kawai, H., 1994. â€Å"International comparative analysis of economic growth: trade liberalization and productivity†,In: The Developing Economies, 17(4): 373-397. McIntyre, J., R. Narula, and L. Trevino, 1996. â€Å"The role of export processing zones for host countries and multinationals: a mutually beneficial relationship?† The International Trade Journal, 10(4): 435-466. Mencinger, J., 2003. â€Å"Does foreign direct investment always enhance economic growth?† Kyklos, 56(4): 491-508. Nunnenkamp, P., 2002. â€Å"FDI and Economic Growth in developing Countries†. Journal of world Investment, Vol. 3, in print OECD, 1998. Open Markets Matter: The benefits of trade and investment liberalization, Paris: OECD. Pavlinek, P., 2004. â€Å"Regional development implications of foreign direct investment in Central Europe†. In: European Urban and Regional Studies. Vol. 11 (1). pp. 47-70. Safarian, A.E, 1999. Host country policies towards inward foreign investment in the 1950s and 1990s, Transnational Corporations ¸.8 (2). Sjà ¶holm, F., 1997b. â€Å"Productivity growth in Indonesia: the role of regional characteristics and direct foreign investment†. In: Economic Development and Cultural Changes, 47: 559-584. Velde, D.W., 2001. Policies towards foreign direct investment in developing countries: emerging best-practices and outstanding issues. London: Overseas Development Institute Xu, B., 2000. â€Å"Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth†, Journal of Development Economics, 62: 477-493.